I am becoming one of those few Turks that no longer understand the merits of marriage (other than providing a stable environment for the kids) and I have yet to find the reasons to prove otherwise.

I have relatives, friends, acquittances who married young, old, late, for a wonder, planned, unplanned, for love, just because, for money, to block the pressure, after the “accidental” baby, for family, for title, for beauty and/or to disguise sexual preferences. I met the wiser husband. I met the reasonable family man. I met the dedicated love guru. I met the extremely happy father. There is almost always a complaint, a lack of satisfaction, a need to touch fresh boobs, a drive to hear unconditional sex stories, a regret, a wish to go back and do things differently. I met the loving wife. I met the unselfish mother. There is always a drive to hang out with a bigger spender, the wish for a break from the family worries, a need to wine & dine with a more charismatic guy, a wish to have made a better decision. The ancestors insist marriage is a blessing, a miracle, but I question whether its sanctity remains the same given all the cultural changes in our modern age society. And given my background I will only speak for the Turkish society.
The first change is visible on the new generation’s dependence on the maternal family and vice versa. Today the couple forming the new family does not cut their financial and emotional dependence from the parents. The husbands rely on the fathers (both theirs and their wives’) if ever there is a shortfall in money. The wives depend on the safety of their mother’s house if ever there is a quarrel. So the new house built with the marriage is cursed to be nothing more than a theatrical stage used by the performers only if there is a well-choreographed “happy” play at hand. The stage is evacuated in the light of any tough disaster and things are tried to be worked out away from it. In the old Turkish times, marriage meant the complete departure of the husband-and-wife-to-be from their maternal homes. Unlike the modern age, the notion of the maternal home as the crisis center would not be valid in the old times. Yes, there would be similar instances of infidelity, disrespect and disagreement, but all those would stay between the wife and the husband until they could no longer be worked out.
The second change is apparent on the new generation’s sympathy over self-dependance. The fortunate teenager who is blessed with all the technological means to a global life no longer finds comfort in the social, communal attractions, but in isolated exclusive activities. The able adult who collects the fruits of a well-paying job finds the sweet satisfaction of self-reliance unexchangeable. The luxury of privacy overrules the altruism of sharing. The blown-up self respect occupies the room supposed to be shared by the patience and self-denial required to make the “couple” work. The diversity of the means to consumption and the limitless drive to dress-to-impress gives way to ultimate egoism. The need to observe and listen compensates the need to talk, making the silence the preference. Thus, when the wedding bells ring it becomes a hell to sacrifice and submit to sharing.
Unlike today, marriage in the old times meant a higher social standing for both the wife and the husband. Almost all the marriages would be completed before the 30s with the consent of the parents. The girl would usually be much younger than the guy. She would be inexperienced, well-educated, talented and financially dependent (as she would have almost no work history). She would have a limited say in her parent’s home and would be socially active only within strict boundaries, making the marriage a much sweeter deal for her in terms of independence. The guy on the other hand would be fresh on his job partially supported by the father until he can be fully independent. The sex-driven teen wouldn’t be as lucky as today’s playboy as almost all the decent family girls would choose to wait until the wedding night. The drive to reproduce and the continuity of the family tree would be a priority for the son, thus making the marriage his ultimate goal.
We live in an era where both the men and the women have the means to be intractable and aggressive. That is why things have gotten much harder for the new age marriage where none of the sides agree to submit to one another. The sharp cut of divorce is just a few words and the sweet comfort of the maternal home is just a few blocks away. The divorced guy is still luckier in terms of finding a fresh mate and it is not as bad as it used to be for the divorced wife.
The only subtle thing that tames the two stallions of the modern age is the responsibility over and the love for their kids. These juniors seem to be the ones that provide the parents with the means to let go of the sweet life before marriage and give into the necessities of parenthood.
It is clear that marriage, like all the other ancient systems, needs a touch-up to make it a sweat deal also for the new generation, yet I have yet to find out what kind of a change is required to make things work in harmony.